MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2759809368 · doi:10.7202/1039328ar

Un exemple de « groulxisme » appliqué

2017· article· fr· W2759809368 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Michel Bock

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers Charlevoix Études franco-ontariennes · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University AssociationUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Michel Bock présente un « exemple de groulxisme appliqué ». Dans cet article, qui brosse le portrait de la première moitié de l’histoire de l’Association de la jeunesse franco-ontarienne (Ajfo), un organisme fondé par l’Association canadienne-française d’éducation de l’Ontario (Acféo) et qui vécut de 1949 à 1972, Bock montre que l’Ajfo logeait bien à l’enseigne du « groulxisme », ses activités et sa « conception de l’identité des Franco-Ontariens s’inscrivant sans ambages dans le grand projet national du Canada français ». Traditionaliste, elle avait reçu le mandat de former les futurs dirigeants de la nation canadienne-française en Ontario et se considérait, par conséquent, comme une véritable école de « chefs ». La formule qu’elle privilégiait était celle de l’étude nationale et religieuse, formule austère qu’elle eut parfois beaucoup de difficulté à imposer à ses membres. L’Ajfo déploya de nombreux efforts pour rassembler la jeunesse de tout l’Ontario français, voire du Canada français, conformément à une conception organique et culturelle de la nation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.026
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers Charlevoix Études franco-ontariennesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207