Entre actualisation et contextualisation, deux lectures de Madame Bovary en seconde générale et professionnelle : l’invention d’une anachronie heuristique ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’enseignement de la lecture littéraire au lycée est marqué, d’un point de vue institutionnel, par la mise en exergue d’un souci de contextualisation des œuvres étudiées, alors que les recherches en didactique de la littérature pointent la reconfiguration des textes par des sujets lecteurs ; en outre, les travaux d’Yves Citton ont mis l’accent sur l’intérêt d’un processus d’actualisation des textes littéraires. À travers l’analyse de deux séquences de seconde de lycée professionnel et général, notre article interroge la place et la fonction de l’actualisation ainsi que la coexistence de celle-ci avec une perspective contextualisante : ceci nous conduit à formuler l’hypothèse du développement d’une forme d’anachronie heuristique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".