La médiation culturelle pour les sourds dans le milieu muséal au Québec. Etat de la situation et présentation des publics sourds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tout au long de cet article, il est propose d'explorer le champ de la mediation culturelle a travers l'univers de la communaute sourde. Malgre les ameliorations des dispositifs de mediation culturelle en contexte museal, il existe encore des personnes qui ne frequentent pas ou peu les musees. Il s'agira donc de reflechir aux difficultes rencontrees par la population sourde dans leur acces aux institutions museales en y analysant trois thematiques : les besoins particuliers de cette communaute ; les dispositifs de mediation qui existent au Quebec et ceux qui pourraient etre implantes ; sans oublier les elements pouvant constituer des pistes de solution. La recherche s'orientant selon une dynamique d'enquete exploratoire qualitative, les elements apportes dans la communication permettront de clarifier un sujet tres peu couvert tout en delimitant rigoureusement ses composantes. Le but de cet article sera de prendre conscience des differences entre les publics des musees et de sensibiliser sur les besoins d'une accessibilite globale et adequate en fonction des caracteristiques propres a chacun d’eux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.025 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".