MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2759981695

Interactions of Surfactant Protein D with the Glycoproteins Ovalbumin and Alpha-2-Macroglobulin

2009· dissertation· en· W2759981695 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hayley Craig‐Barnes

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvalbuminGlycoproteinalpha-2-MacroglobulinAlpha (finance)MacroglobulinChemistryPulmonary surfactantBiochemistryImmunologyBiologyMedicineImmune system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surfactant protein D (SP-D) is an important innate immune collectin involved in uptake and clearance of microbes and allergens in the lungs. SP-D has been shown to ameliorate allergic asthma reactions in mice; however, the mechanisms for this are not fully understood. We investigated the role of SP-D in the uptake and clearance of the model allergen ovalbumin (OVA) by macrophages. We discovered that SP-D does not bind OVA but binds fractions with contaminating proteins; ovomucin and ovomacroglobulin. We extended these findings to show that SP-D binds human alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M) in its cleaved or intact state, in a concentration-, calcium-, and carbohydrate-dependent manner. A2M increases the innate immune potential of SP-D by increasing its ability to agglutinate the bacteria Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. We found that SP-D does not increase the uptake of OVA by murine macrophage cell lines, or by alveolar macrophages in vivo in BALB/cJ mice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→