Mengukur Tingkat Efisiensi Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syari’ah dengan Menggunakan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficiency level of Shari'ah People's Financing Bank (BPRS) in Surakarta City. The data used in this study is secondary data taken from www.ojk.co.id published by each Sharia Bank Financing (BPRS). This research uses input-output variable with Data Evelopment Analysis (DEA) method. The result of the research shows that in Quarter I - Quarter IV there is only one Sharia Bank Financing (BPRS) that experienced inefficiency. Based on the calculation using Data Evelopment Analysis (DEA), in Quarter II - Quarter IV BPRS Central Syari'ah Utama experienced inefficiency, whereas in Quarter I - IV IV BPRS Dana Amanah, BPRS Dana Mulia, BPRS Harta Insan Karimah showed efficiency. The period 2016 Quarter I - fourth quarter IV of Syari'ah People Financing Bank (BPRS) that is BPRS Dana Amanah, BPRS Dana Mulia, BPRS Harta Insan Karimah already 1,000 or experienced efficiency continue to take care during that quarter
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it