MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760135708 · doi:10.4271/2017-01-9287

Reduced Convective Combustion Chamber Wall Heat Transfer Losses of Hydrogen-Fueled Engines by Vortex-Stratified Combustion - Part 2: Numerical Analyses

2017· article· en· W2760135708 on OpenAlexaff
David Oh, Martin Brouillette, Jean‐Sébastien Plante

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE International Journal of Engines · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustion chamberCombustionMechanicsVortexConvective heat transferConvectionHydrogenMaterials scienceHeat transferThermodynamicsEnvironmental scienceChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this second of two parts, the fundamentals of convective wall heat transfer losses are elucidated in the context of the desired objective toward its reduction in a direct-injected, hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engine. A comparative, transient 2D CFD analysis evaluated at 4500 RPM between a combustion chamber design representing current practice and the here-introduced “vortex-stratified combustion” process finds an approximately 50% reduction in the peak convective flux with the latter. The simulation results show that reduced heat flux of the vortex approach is driven by the combination of two effects: The first is finite-time diffusive mixing getting outpaced by the replenishment of pure air being introduced preferentially along the circumference of the combustion chamber due to the Coandă effect; this results in a distinct radial charge stratification during mixture preparation in the compression stroke, with a fuel-concentrated center and essentially pure air at the periphery. The second effect is the forced-segregation of different density reactants during the course of the combustion process caused by large body forces that result from the gravitational acceleration of the rapidly rotating charge, thereby constraining the combustible mixture and the flame to some distance from the walls. Evidence for this is observed by hot, low-density hydrogen being forced to remain near the center and cooler, heavier oxygen being inhibited from migrating from the outer periphery to react with the aforementioned hydrogen, and the distinct curvature of the radial gas temperature profile at a substantially greater distance from the wall than the thermal boundary layer thickness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE International Journal of EnginesSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207