MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760343167 · doi:10.20318/eunomia.2017.3803

Del referéndum a la secesión – El proceso quebequense de acceso a la soberanía y las lecciones aprendidas con respecto a la autodeterminación = From referendum to secession – The Québécois process of accession to sovereignty and its teachings with respect to self-determination

2017· article· es· W2760343167 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dave Guénette, Alain‐G. Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueEUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSovereigntyIndependence (probability theory)PoliticsPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen: Como resultado de los dos referenda sobre la soberanía en 1980 y 1995, Quebec se ha convertido en un caso clave entre el resto de democracias occidentales. Se trata de un estado moderno desarrollado que intenta obtener su independencia, no en tiempo de guerra ni debido a una opresión política grave, ni con el fin de poner fin a una ocupación colonial de sus territorios o de liberarse de un sistema político antidemocrático, sino por razones que son, en primera instancia, culturales, identitarias, lingüísticas y económicas. En este sentido, y a pesar de la falta de éxito en los dos intentos de referéndum, la nación quebequense aún debe ser reconocida por su rol pionero en cuanto a reconocer el derecho a la secesión de las naciones minoritarias. Al adoptar este enfoque, este artículo se centra en el proceso quebequense de acceso a la soberanía y en las lecciones que puede mostrar, en este sentido, a una España multinacional.Palabras clave: Autodeterminación externa, naciones minoritarias, secesión, referéndum, Quebec, proceso soberanista catalán. Abstract: As a result of the two referenda on sovereignty held in 1980 and 1995, Quebec has somehow become something of a figurehead for western democracies. It represents a modern developed state seeking national independence, not in time of war or because of serious political oppression, or to end colonial dependence in its territory or rid itself of an antidemocratic political system, but rather and above all by taking this path for cultural, identity, linguistic and economic reasons. In this regard, and notwithstanding the fact that both referenda failed to bring independence, it is still fair to grant the Québéquois nation a pioneering role in terms of recognising the right of minority nations to secede. In adopting this approach, this article looks at the Québéquois process of accessing sovereignty and the lessons that it can offer, in this regard, to a multinational Spain. Keywords: External self-determination, minority nations, secession, referendum, Quebec, Catalan sovereignty process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.016
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la LegalidadSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207