MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760389213 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v34i2.21037

Fears, Hopes, and Regeneration in <i>Tre fratelli</i>: The Return of the Child in the 1980s

2014· article· en· W2760389213 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gaetana Marrone

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDysfunctional familySoulIdeologyDaughterArtTerrorismHistorySociologyHumanitiesArt historyPsychologyLawPolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophyPoliticsPsychiatryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With Tre fratelli (1981), Francesco Rosi turns to the troubled years when the nation’s ideological fabric began to disintegrate and captures the fear of a nation on the verge of collapse, producing a film of devastating emotional impact. Tre fratelli is the tale of three brothers summoned back to their childhood home in Puglia for the funeral of their mother. These very different brothers serve as a cross section for contemporary Italian society: Raffaele, a self-assured judge in Rome whose life is haunted by the fear of terrorist assassination; Rocco, an idealistic teacher who works at a reformatory in Naples; Nicola, a factory worker and labor organizer in Turin. The brothers’ estrangement from their cultural roots creates a disaffected young generation, which is symptomatic of Italy’s dysfunctional present. The youth’s problems are symbolized by the judge’s teen-age son Giorgio and Rocco’s institutional minors. Only Nicola’s eight-years old daughter Marta embodies a solution of regeneration. A magical presence, she gives life to a historical present in which the human soul contains the seeds of the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.022
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyFrench-language works237,207