MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760390726 · doi:10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.wp99

Abstract WP99: Neuroprotective Therapy for Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Hemoglobin-albumin-cluster(Hemoact <sup>Tm</sup> )

2017· article· en· W2760390726 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHemoglobin structure and function
Canadian institutionsElectrovaya (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuroprotectionHemoglobinAnesthesiaIschemiaReperfusion injuryAlbuminEdemaPerfusionMiddle cerebral arteryCerebral blood flowInfarctionPharmacologyInternal medicineMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: A hemoglobin-albumin cluster designated as “HemoAct” was developed as a red blood cell substitute. It is composed of one core hemoglobin center wrapped covalently by three albumin shells. Since its particle size with a diameter of 10 nm is far smaller than red blood cell, it is expected to maintain good perfusion in the cerebral microvessels, leading to neuroprotective effects on ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. Purpose: We aim to examine whether HemoAct have neuroprotective effects in rat transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) model, without toxic effects of hemoglobin, by administering it though the recanalized artery just before the onset of reperfusion. Subjects and Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to 2-hour tMCAO by suture occlusion and then divided into four groups with respective treatments: (1) control group; no infusion, (2) vehicle group; infusion of PBS as the solvent (3) 0.5х HemoAct group; infusion of one-half diluted HemoAct (4) HemoAct group; infusion of undiluted HemoAct. Physical and neurological states, infarct and edema volumes, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and protease immunoblot levels were compared between the four groups after 24 hours of reperfusion. Microvascular hemoglobin perfusion and morphological states were compared between the control and HemoAct groups with immunohistochemical technique. Results: No significant changes were observed in blood pressure, pH, and blood gas after HemoAct infusion. Neurological symptoms were significantly less severe in the HemoAct group than in the other groups. Infarct and edema volumes were significantly smaller in the 0.5х HemoAct group (27.1%/15.2%) and the HemoAct group (20.2%/14.1%) than in the control group (55.2%/26.4%) and the vehicle group (53.2%/27.1%). ROS (4-HNE) and protease (MMP-9) immunoblot levels were significantly reduced in HemoAct group compared with the control and vehicle groups. Microvascular hemoglobin perfusion was more and microvascular narrowing changes was less in the HemoAct group than in the control group. Conclusion: HemoAct exhibited strong neuroprotective effects on I/R injury without toxic effects of hemoglobin. Superior microvascular perfusion of HemoAct may be a possible neuroprotective mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it