MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2760405457 · doi:10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3932

Abstract 3932: High Rate Of Radiographic Stroke Recurrence In Cryptogenic TIA And Minor Stroke Patients: A Prospective Imaging Study

2012· article· en· W2760405457 on OpenAlexaff
Simerpreet Bal, Shiel K. Patel, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Jayesh Modi, Andrew M. Demchuk, Shelagh B. Coutts

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Prospective cohort studyPopulationEtiologyModified Rankin ScaleOccultInternal medicineCardiologySurgeryRadiologyIschemic strokePathologyIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cryptogenic stroke (CS) mechanism in patients with TIA/Minor stroke has a recurrent stroke risk of 1-6% within 3 months. There is some evidence to suggest that an occult embolic phenomenon would be a likely cause of stroke in many patients with CS. It is likely that radiographic event rates are higher than clinical event rates which may potentially be a therapeutic target for proof of concept prevention trials. We sought to determine clinical and radiographic event rates in patients with cryptogenic mechanisms in a TIA/minor stroke population. Methods: Patients with TIA/Minor stroke (NIH Stroke Scale ≤ 3) were prospectively enrolled and imaged within 24 hours of symptom onset as part of two prospective imaging cohorts. [VISION (V) and CATCH (C)]. Patients were included if their baseline modified Rankin scale (mRS) was ≤1. All patients were followed clinically for 3 months to document any clinical recurrence and had a repeat MRI either at day 30 (V) or at day 90 (C). Stroke mechanisms were categorized as per TOAST criteria after parenchymal and vascular imaging and cardiac investigations. Patients were labelled as cryptogenic only after standard etiological workup for ischemic stroke including at least vascular imaging, transthoracic echocardiogram and holter monitoring was completed. Follow up imaging was assessed for any new lesions in comparison to baseline imaging. Results: Among patients enrolled in both prospective studies 380/844(45%) had cryptogenic stroke mechanisms. Of these, 215 patients had follow up imaging. There were 132 (61%) males. Intracranial occlusions was seen in 23/215 (10.6%) with baseline DWI abnormality documented in 66/215 (30.6%). In the VISION dataset, 5/76 (6.6%, 95%CI 2.2-15%) patients had new lesions on follow-up MRI at day 30. In the CATCH dataset 19/131 (14.5%: 9-22%) of patients had new lesions on follow-up MRI at day 90. Baseline DWI abnormalities was a significant predictor of new radiological lesions on follow-up imaging [p=0.003 OR 4.75 95% CI: 1.67-13.2]. Overall clinical recurrence was seen in 10/215 (4.6%: 2.2-8.4%) of patients. Baseline DWI abnormality was not a significant predictor of clinical recurrence (p=0.96). Conclusion: TIA/Minor stroke patients with cryptogenic mechanism show evidence of silent radiological accumulation of disease on follow up imaging at a higher rate than clinical recurrence. Repeat brain imaging at 3 months or potentially later may be a useful surrogate marker for disease activity in treatment trials in this population. There is a need for randomized controlled trials using novel anticoagulants with follow-up imaging as a surrogate marker of disease activity to improve treatment of cryptogenic minor stroke/TIA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→