MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760465763

Pattern Discovery in DNA Sequences

2012· dissertation· en· W2760465763 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rui Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational biologyEvolutionary biologyBiologyGeneticsData scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pattern is a relatively short sequence that represents a phenomenon in a set of sequences. Not all short sequences are patterns; only those that are statistically significant are referred to as patterns or motifs. Pattern discovery methods analyze sequences and attempt to identify and characterize meaningful patterns. This thesis extends the application of pattern discovery algorithms to a new problem domain - Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) classification.\nSNPs are single base-pair (bp) variations in the genome, and are probably the most common form of genetic variation. On average, one in every thousand bps may be an SNP. The function of most SNPs, especially those not associated with protein sequence changes, remains unclear. However, genome-wide linkage analyses have associated many SNPs with disorders ranging from Crohn’s disease, to cancer, to quantitative traits such as height or hair color. As a result, many groups are working to predict the functional effects of individual SNPs. In contrast, very little research has examined the causes of SNPs: Why do SNPs occur where they do? \nThis thesis addresses this problem by using pattern discovery algorithms to study DNA non-coding sequences. The hypothesis is that short DNA patterns can be used to predict SNPs. For example, such patterns found in the SNP sequence might block the DNA repair mechanism for the SNP, thus causing SNP occurrence. In order to test the hypothesis, a model is developed to predict SNPs by using pattern discovery methods. The results show that SNP prediction with pattern discovery methods is weak (50 2%), whereas machine learning classification algorithms can achieve prediction accuracy as high as 68%. To determine whether the poor performance of pattern discovery is due to data characteristics (such as sequence length or pattern length) or to the specific biological problem (SNP prediction), a survey was conducted by profiling eight representative pattern discovery methods at multiple parameter settings on 6,754 real biological datasets. This is the first systematic review of pattern discovery methods with assessments of prediction accuracy, CPU usage and memory consumption. It was found that current pattern discovery methods do not consider positional information and do not handle short sequences well (<150 bps), including SNP sequences. \nTherefore, this thesis proposes a new supervised pattern discovery classification algorithm, referred to as Weighted-Position Pattern Discovery and Classification (WPPDC). The WPPDC is able to exploit positional information to identify positionally-enriched motifs, and to select motifs with a high information content for further classification. Tree structure is applied to WPPDC (referred to as T-WPPDC) in order to reduce algorithmic complexity. Compared to pattern discovery methods T-WPPDC not only showed consistently superior prediction accuracy and but generated patterns with positional information. Machine-learning classification methods (such as Random Forests) showed comparable prediction accuracy. However, unlike T-WPPDC, they are classification methods and are unable to generate SNP-associated patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207