MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760770089

Canada eases tax burden on hard-pressed mining industry

2015· article· en· W2760770089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josie Shillito

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespondentJurisdictionEndowmentGovernment (linguistics)BusinessShareholderMining industryDutyFinanceAccountingEngineeringPolitical scienceLawMining engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The shareholder can deduct the expenses as if incurred directly, according to PriceWaterhouseCoopers' (PwC) report, Canadian Mining Taxation. [A] recent situation with First Nations blocking development after both federal and provincial regulators had approved [a] project. Who actually has jurisdiction over the land and mineral endowment? Clearly not the elected governments, but the 'special' interest groups, said one respondent. In 'Duty to Consult' is the responsibility of government, not the company. Something like the Ring of Fire fiasco [delays and wrangling over land use for a chromite mine] in Ontario would not happen in Saskatchewan, said another respondent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207