MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760864379 · doi:10.1109/gecs.2017.8066246

FCS-MPC for grid-tied three-phase three-level NPC inverter with experimental validation

2017· article· en· W2760864379 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Hamdi, Mahmoud Hamouda, Lassâad Sbita, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 International Conference on Green Energy Conversion Systems (GECS) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sleep & Circadian NetworkHEC MontréalÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)GridInverterControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlAC powerComputer scienceConvertersOvercurrentNetwork topologyVoltageEngineeringElectronic engineeringControl (management)Electrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed power generation systems (DPGS) tend to increase their capacities of production of electricity. Multilevel converters are considered today among the most suitable topologies for DPGS connected medium voltage grids. On the other hand, Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Control (FSC-MPC) has become in the last decade a promising control method thanks to its fast dynamic response and robustness. In this paper, this control method is applied on a grid-tied three-phase three-level neutral point clamped (NPC) inverter. The main objectives behind the proposed method are: performs a perfecto control of the powers exchanged with the grid active and reactive powers in steady state operation, and avoid the overcurrent due to the grid faults. The effectiveness of the proposed FSC-MPC applied on the NPC converter is validated with numerical simulations and experimental tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2017 International Conference on Green Energy Conversion Systems (GECS)Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207