Multiple level-set joint inversion of traveltime and gravity data with application to ore delineation: A synthetic study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have developed a multiple level-set method for simultaneous inversion of gravity and seismic traveltime data. The method recovers the boundaries between regions with distinct physical properties assumed constant and known, creating structurally consistent models of two subsurface properties: P-wave velocity and density. In single level-set methods, only two rock units can be considered: background and inclusion. Such methods have been applied to examples representing various geophysical scenarios, including in the context of joint inversion. In multiple level-set methods, several units can be considered, which make them far more applicable to real earth scenarios. Recently, a multiple level-set method has been proposed for inversion of magnetic data. We extend the multiple level-set formulation to joint inversion of gravity and traveltime data, improving upon previous work, and we investigate applicability of such an inversion method in ore delineation. In mineral exploration environments, traditional seismic imaging and inversion methods are challenging because of the small target size and the specific physical property contrasts involved. First-arrival seismic traveltime and gravity data complement each other, and we found that joint multiple level-set inversion is more beneficial than separate inversions, especially with limited data and slow targets. Our method is more robust than the joint inversion method based on clustering of physical properties in recovery of piecewise homogeneous models not well-constrained by the data. To justify the known property assumption, we found the degree of robustness of the multiple level-set joint inversion to uncertainties arising from incomplete knowledge of small-scale subsurface physical property variations and target composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".