Cognitive impairment and compliance in chronic heart failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To determine the factors of cognitive impairment and non-compliance in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients with CHF and 32 patients without chronic heart failure (controls) were examined. Neuropsychological assessment using a 30-minutes protocol recommended by NINDS-Canadian Stroke Standards (NINDS CSS), magnetic resonance imaging, cognitive ERP and a test of compliance were used. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Approximately 62% of patients did not perform medical prescriptions. Non-compliance was associated with an increase in the severity of subcortical and perivenricular leukoaraiosis, a slowdown in decision-making processes (an increase in the P300 latency), worse performance on speech activity tests, optical/spatial and frontal dysfunctions and memory. Patients with non-compliance had frontal cognitive impairment (58%), memory impairment (40%) and mixed forms (21%). Cognitive impairment in patients with chronic heart failure was associated with the lower left ventricular ejection fraction and deterioration in indices of diastolic function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".