MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761031851 · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055

The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies From 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level

2017· article· en· W2761031851 on OpenAlexaff
Tomi Akinyemiju, Semaw Ferede Abera, Muktar Beshir Ahmed, Noore Alam, Mulubirhan Assefa Alemayohu, Christine A. Allen, Rajaa Al‐Raddadi, Nelson Alvis‐Guzmán, Yaw Ampem Amoako, Al Artaman, Tadesse Awoke Ayele, Aleksandra Barać, Isabela M. Benseñor, Adugnaw Berhane, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Jacqueline Castillo-Rivas, Abdulaal Chitheer, Jee-Young Jasmine Choi, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Dandona, Subhojit Dey, Daniel Dicker, Huyen Phuc, Donatus U. Ekwueme, Maysaa El Sayed Zaki, Florian Fischer, Thomas Fürst, Jamie Hancock, Simon I Hay, Peter J. Hotez, Sun Ha Jee, Amir Kasaeian, Yousef Khader, Young‐Ho Khang, G Anil Kumar, Michael Kutz, Heidi J. Larson, Alan D Lopez, Raimundas Lunevičius, Reza Malekzadeh, Colm McAlinden, Toni Meier, Walter Mendoza, Ali H. Mokdad, Maziar Moradi‐Lakeh, Gabriele Nagel, Quyen Le Nguyen, Grant Nguyen, Felix Akpojene Ogbo, George Patton, David M. Pereira, Farshad Pourmalek, Mostafa Qorbani, Amir Radfar, Gholamreza Roshandel, Joshua A. Salomon, Juan Sanabria, Benn Sartorius, Maheswar Satpathy, Monika Sawhney, Sadaf G Sepanlou, Katya Anne Shackelford, Hirbo Shore Roba, Jiandong Sun, Desalegn Tadese Mengistu, Roman Topór-Mądry, Bach Xuan Tran, Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja, Vasily Vlassov, Theo Vos, Tolassa Wakayo, Elisabete Weiderpass, Andrea Werdecker, Naohiro Yonemoto, Mustafa Z Younis, Chuanhua Yu, Zoubida Zaidi, Liguo Zhu, Christopher J L Murray, Mohsen Naghavi, Christina Fitzmaurice

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids FoundationUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRede de Química e TecnologiaWestern Sydney UniversityIngham Institute for Applied Medical ResearchUniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Slaskich we WroclawiuUniversität UlmLaboratório Associado para a Química VerdeGolestan University of Medical SciencesNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsTexas Children's HospitalUniversitetet i OsloUniversitetet i BergenJimma UniversityHaramaya UniversitySeoul National UniversityAlborz University of Medical SciencesMekelle UniversityQueensland University of TechnologyUniversität BielefeldPublic Health Foundation of IndiaKarolinska InstitutetYonsei UniversityAll-India Institute of Medical SciencesIran University of Medical SciencesWuhan UniversityJordan University of Science and TechnologyJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of WashingtonImperial College LondonInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliFogarty International CenterUniversidade do PortoUniwersytet Jagielloński Collegium MedicumCase Western Reserve UniversityTehran University of Medical Sciences and Health ServicesNorwegian Institute of Public HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionJackson State UniversityUniversitetet i TromsøUniversität BaselCollege of Medicine, Seoul National UniversitySabin Vaccine Institute
KeywordsMedicineYears of potential life lostLife expectancyLiver cancerCancerIncidence (geometry)Mortality rateDemographyDisease burdenStandardized mortality ratioPopulationEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance Liver cancer is among the leading causes of cancer deaths globally. The most common causes for liver cancer include hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and alcohol use. Objective To report results of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2015 study on primary liver cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 195 countries or territories from 1990 to 2015, and present global, regional, and national estimates on the burden of liver cancer attributable to HBV, HCV, alcohol, and an “other” group that encompasses residual causes. Design, Settings, and Participants Mortality was estimated using vital registration and cancer registry data in an ensemble modeling approach. Single-cause mortality estimates were adjusted for all-cause mortality. Incidence was derived from mortality estimates and the mortality-to-incidence ratio. Through a systematic literature review, data on the proportions of liver cancer due to HBV, HCV, alcohol, and other causes were identified. Years of life lost were calculated by multiplying each death by a standard life expectancy. Prevalence was estimated using mortality-to-incidence ratio as surrogate for survival. Total prevalence was divided into 4 sequelae that were multiplied by disability weights to derive years lived with disability (YLDs). DALYs were the sum of years of life lost and YLDs. Main Outcomes and Measures Liver cancer mortality, incidence, YLDs, years of life lost, DALYs by etiology, age, sex, country, and year. Results There were 854 000 incident cases of liver cancer and 810 000 deaths globally in 2015, contributing to 20 578 000 DALYs. Cases of incident liver cancer increased by 75% between 1990 and 2015, of which 47% can be explained by changing population age structures, 35% by population growth, and −8% to changing age-specific incidence rates. The male-to-female ratio for age-standardized liver cancer mortality was 2.8. Globally, HBV accounted for 265 000 liver cancer deaths (33%), alcohol for 245 000 (30%), HCV for 167 000 (21%), and other causes for 133 000 (16%) deaths, with substantial variation between countries in the underlying etiologies. Conclusions and Relevance Liver cancer is among the leading causes of cancer deaths in many countries. Causes of liver cancer differ widely among populations. Our results show that most cases of liver cancer can be prevented through vaccination, antiviral treatment, safe blood transfusion and injection practices, as well as interventions to reduce excessive alcohol use. In line with the Sustainable Development Goals, the identification and elimination of risk factors for liver cancer will be required to achieve a sustained reduction in liver cancer burden. The GBD study can be used to guide these prevention efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2,020
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA OncologySame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207