MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761061330 · doi:10.1086/342445

The Embedded Super–Star Cluster of SBS 0335−052

2002· article· en· W2761061330 on OpenAlexaff
S. Plante, M. Sauvage

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAstrophysicsPhysicsGalaxyExtinction (optical mineralogy)Spectral energy distributionAstronomyMetallicityStar clusterStar formationInfraredCircumstellar dustCosmic dustDwarf galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the infrared (6-100 micron) spectral energy distribution of the blue compact dwarf and metal-poor (Z=Z_solar/41) galaxy SBS0335-052. With the help of DUSTY (Ivezic et al. 1999), a program that solves the radiation transfer equations in a spherical environment, we evaluate that the infrared (IR) emission of SBS0335-052 is produced by an embedded super-star cluster (SSC) hidden under 10^5 M_solar of dust, causing 30 mag of visual extinction. This implies that one cannot detect any stellar emission from the 2x10^6 M_solar stellar cluster even at near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths. The derived grain size distribution departs markedly from the widely accepted size distribution inferred for dust in our galaxy (the so-called MRN distribution, Mathis et al. 1977), but resembles what is seen around AGNs, namely an absence of PAH and smaller grains, and grains that grow to larger sizes (around 1 micron). The fact that a significant amount of dust is present in such a low-metallicity galaxy, hiding from UV and optical view most of the star formation activity in the galaxy, and that the dust size distribution cannot be reproduced by a standard galactic law, should be borne in mind when interpreting the spectrum of primeval galaxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207