MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2761085414 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.suppl_a.39ab

68 Prognostic Value of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Brain Injury and Severe Retinopathy in Determining Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants

2004· article· en· W2761085414 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yvonne Andersson, Aaron Chiu, V Debooy, Naomi Granke, Diane Moddemann, Oscar Casiro

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaMedicineRetinopathy of prematurityPeriventricular leukomalaciaPediatricsVentriculomegalyCerebral palsyGestational ageLow birth weightBirth weightIntraventricular hemorrhageHydrocephalusPregnancySurgeryPhysical therapyFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extremely low birth weight infants (ELBW) are at high risk for developmental impairment. Predicting such risk for ELBW survivors is difficult. Recently, Schmidt et al. proposed such risks can be accurately predicted for ELBW infants surviving to 36 weeks corrected gestational age (cGA), using a simple numerical count of three specific neonatal morbidities: bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) – defined as supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks cGA, brain injury – defined as the presence of Grade 3 or 4 intra-ventricular haemorrhage, porencephalic cyst, ventriculomegaly, periventricular leukomalacia, or hydrocephalus, and severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) – defined as bilateral Grade 3 or 4 or threshold disease. We evaluated this prediction rule using a regional follow-up database of ELBW infants. The study included a total of 225 ELBW infants (birth weight 500–999 g) who were born in Manitoba, Canada between 1992 and December 2001 and survived to 36 weeks cGA. The morbidities of interest (BPD, brain injury, and ROP) were abstracted. Poor outcome was defined as death or neurodevelop-mental impairment (the presence of one or more of cerebral palsy, cognitive delay, severe hearing loss, and bilateral blindness by 14–26 months of age cGA). Of the 225 infants, 86 developed BPD (38.2%), 80 (35.6%) had a brain injury, 82 infants (36.4%) had severe ROP. Five of the 225 infants died after 36 weeks cGA. The overall risk of death or poor neurodevelopmental impairment was 46.2%. Without any of the three neonatal morbidities, the risk of poor outcome was 22%. There was an increase in risk of poor outcome with increasing number of neonatal morbidities. The risk of poor outcome with any single neonatal morbidity, any two neonatal morbidities and any three neonatal morbidities was 37.7%, 75% and 84.8% respectively (Figure 1). We conclude that the simple count of the three neonatal morbidities suggested by Schmidt et al. can be a useful predictor of the risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment in ELBW infants surviving to 36 weeks cGA. Percentage of Poor Outcome (14–26 Months) in Study Infants With 0, 1, 2, and All 3 Neonatal Morbidities. Dotted line indicates overall percentage of poor outcome (46.2%). 0 morbidity=22%, 1 morbidity=37.7%, 2 morbidities=75%, 3 morbidities =84.8% of poor outcome

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→