Une approche comparative des discours institutionnels en éducation aux médias : une analyse socio-anthropologique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans une démarche à la fois diachronique et synchronique, ce texte fait état d’une analyse socio-anthropologique des discours officiels sur l’éducation aux médias dans trois contextes distincts (Australie, Québec, France). La spécificité des instances énonciatives y est questionnée à travers une approche comparative internationale en vue de dévoiler le rapport que les énoncés entretiennent avec le contexte socio-culturel duquel ils émergent. Il apparaît que l’éducation aux médias est un domaine qui se structure et est institué par des discours militants, programmatiques et prescriptifs, portés par des instances institutionnelles (ministères de l’éducation) et légitimes (organismes sous tutelle ou indépendants). Cette énonciation à deux voix participe de la construction discursive du champ de l’éducation aux médias dans le contexte scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".