MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761173746 · doi:10.1093/pch/15.suppl_a.24ab

Physical Abuse of Women and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

2010· review· en· W2761173746 on OpenAlexaff
PS Shah, Jyotsna Shah, J Zao

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisMedicineSystematic reviewPregnancyObstetricsPhysical abuseMEDLINEPsychiatryPsychologyEnvironmental healthSexual abusePoison controlSuicide preventionPolitical scienceInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No significant difference was noted in the number of B/A prior to day 0. On day 0, the NEC group had significantly more episodes of bradycardias (mean 4.1) and apneas (mean 3.3) when compared to the control group (mean 2.2 and 2.0, and p-value 0.04 and 0.07, respectively). conclusions: The number of B/A is stable during the five days preceding a diagnosis of NEC and only increases on the day of its diagnosis. This suggests that B/A are manifestations of NEC rather than risk factors for it. A further study involving continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring and it's correlation to mesenteric flow before development of NEC would be needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseFrench-language works237,207