MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761248786 · doi:10.31468/cjsdwr.538

Premisses, stereotypes et lieux communs clans un discours de simplification : le cas de l' emission Deux psy a l'ecoute

2005· article· fr· W2761248786 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Céline Beaudet

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscourse and Writing/Rédactologie · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Representations and Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClanPhilosophyHumanitiesSociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le discours épidictique est omniprésent dans notre société hypermédiatisée, centrée sur la glorification de l'individu. Cette recherche avait pour but de voir à l'œuvre les liens entre l'efficacité du discours épidictique et le recours au savoir partagé comme stratégie persuasive. Nous nous sommes penchées à cet effet sur une émission de consultation psychologique radiophonique très populaire au Québec, Deux psys à l'écoute, pour y examiner le rôle des pré-misses, stéréotypes et lieux communs. Notre hypothèse était que pour créer apparence de discours sensé, l'animateur n'a d'autre choix que de rendre accessible son discours en référant au savoir partagé, à la morale commune, puisque le discours scientifique n'ouvrirait pas sur des sanctions rapides et irrévocables, comme c'est le cas ainsi que le but visé dans l'émission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscourse and Writing/RédactologieSame topicSocial Representations and IdentityFrench-language works237,207