MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Developing Recognition Criteria for Current-Wave-Enhanced Sediment Gravity Flows

2015· dissertation· en· W2761286951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathryn C. Denommee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentary depositional environmentGeologySedimentary rockBioturbationSedimentary structuresDiagenesisGeologic recordSedimentDeposition (geology)PaleontologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sedimentary fabrics preserved in the rock record provide some of the best evidence for interpreting paleo-depositional conditions. Muddy sediments in particular are important paleoenvironmental archives, preserving the most complete stratigraphic record of any rock type in basinal settings. However, the full range of mechanisms responsible for the deposition of muddy sediments, particularly in high-energy settings, remains poorly understood. Although frequently observed in modern settings, muddy prodeltaic deposits are rarely identified in the rock record, in part because no catalogue of easily distinguishable recognition criteria exists for this class of mudstones. In order to help overcome this deficiency, this dissertation project employs a combination of oceanographic techniques including shallow seismic surveying, radioisotope geochemistry, sedimentary fabric analyses, and a rock record study to investigate (1) the mechanisms of sediment dispersal and accumulation on the muddy Southwest Louisiana (SWLA) Chenier Plain shelf, where current-wave-enhanced sediment gravity flows (CWESGFs) are understood to play a key role in progradation; (2) the characteristics of the muddy sedimentary fabrics deposited in response to site-specific hydrodynamic conditions on the SWLA shelf; and (3) how muddy sedimentary fabrics deposited in a shallow shelf environment are preserved in the rock record, and how post-depositional changes (e.g., bioturbation, compaction, and diagenesis) alter these fabrics by examining the Ordovician Power Steps Formation, Bell Island, Newfoundland. The results of these investigations show that (1) CWESGFs are effective mechanisms for the offshore transport of muds on the SWLA Chenier Plain shelf. In addition to simply transporting sediment, CWESGFs contribute to the development of unstable seabed conditions where mass-failures can develop, even on extremely low gradients. (2) CWESGF microstratigraphy reflects the site-specific flow development in response to the combined effects of waves, wave period, currents, and gravity and thusly these sediments can be studied in terms of a semi-quantitative framework. (3) The Lower Ordovician Power Steps formation contains sedimentary structures that record evidence of storm-driven muddy transport in a high-energy prodeltaic setting. The high-energy setting likely inhibited bioturbation, while an abundance of highly reactive mafic minerals sourced from a Palaeozoic hinterland led to early cementation that inhibited compaction, preserving diagnostic sedimentary fabrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207