142: Cerebral Thrombosis After Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy of Immune Thrombocytopenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intravenous Immunogloblin (IVIG) is frequently used in the treatment of immune-mediated disorders such as immune thrombocytopenia, inflammatory diseases, and as replacement therapy in immune deficiencies. It is prepared from plasma pooled from thousands of healthy donors and has been used since 1952. It is generally considered safe and secure with acceptable adverse events including headaches, fever, myalgia, urticaria, and nausea. However, rare serious adverse events (SAE) can occur. Over the last decade, IVIG use has dramatically increased across the world. Following one case of IVIG-SAE, we reviewed incidence of such SAE through reports of Quebec Hemovigilance System (QHS). A 16-year-old female presented for severe thrombocytopenia. Given her age and menorrhagia, we choose to give platelet-enhancing agents. She had recurrent episodes of severe thrombocytopenia. First IVIG infusion was followed by severe aseptic meningitis. Given new episode of thrombocytopenia, she received fractionated IVIG infusion which again resulted in normalisation of platelet count, but was complicated within 10 days by hemiparesis and seizures, associated with sinus vein thrombosis. She eventually had a good outcome without minimal sequelae. Through QHS, we found four other reports of thrombotic events possibly related to IVIG therapy, all being adults. Based upon most recent estimates, this corresponded to 0.6% to 1.6% of all reported IVIG-related SAE in QHS. Over a five year period (2005 to 2010), there have been 112 CNS-related events including headaches or aseptic meningitis. The incidence of all reported events further ranged between 1:6683 and 1:9580 events per gram of IVIG given. Since the first report of IVIG-associated thrombosis in 1986, more than one hundred cases have been reported, with only six paediatric cases. Patient's predispositions, such as advanced age, previous thrombotic events, and hypercoagulable state were found to be associated with higher risk of thrombosis. Rapid infusion, high dosage and concentration, have also been implicated. The thrombotic effects of IVIG may be due to contamination with activated coagulation factor XI, arterial vasospasm or increased blood viscosity. ITP has itself been paradoxically recognized as a possible prothrombotic condition. The presence of large platelets with enhanced endothelial adherence, as well as complement activation may partly explain such enhanced thrombotic propensity. Clinicians should have a high suspicion for intracranial complications, including thrombosis, in patients receiving IVIG and history of recurrent headache. IVIG related complications should be thoroughly investigated and properly reported, in order to improve hemovigilance system and study of such rare serious adverse events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".