Venlafaxine in Embryos Stimulates Neurogenesis and Disrupts Larval Behavior in Zebrafish
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Venlafaxine, a widely prescribed antidepressant, is a selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor in humans, and this drug is prevalent in municipal wastewater effluents. While studies have shown that this drug affects juvenile fish behavior, little is known about the developmental impact on nontarget aquatic animals. We tested the hypothesis that venlafaxine deposition in the egg, mimicking maternal transfer of this antidepressant, disrupts developmental programming using zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a model. Embryos (1-4 cell stage) were microinjected with either 1 or 10 ng venlafaxine, which led to a rapid reduction (90%) of this drug in the embryo at hatch. There was a concomitant increase in the concentration of the major metabolite o-desmethylvenlafaxine during the same period. Embryonic exposure to venlafaxine accelerated early development, increased hatching rate and produced larger larvae at 5 days post fertilization. Also, there was an increase in neuronal birth in the hypothalamus, dorsal thalamus, posterior tuberculum, and the preoptic region, and this corresponded with a higher spatial expression of nrd4, a key marker of neurogenesis. The venlafaxine-exposed larvae were less active and covered shorter distance in a light and dark behavioral test compared to the controls. Overall, zygotic exposure to venlafaxine disrupts early development, including brain function, and compromises larval behavior, suggesting impact of this drug on developmental programming in zebrafish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it