MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761689687 · doi:10.1002/2017tc004507

Comment on “U‐Pb and Hf Isotope Analysis of Detrital Zircons From Mesozoic Strata of the Gravina Belt, Southeast Alaska” by Yokelson Et Al. (2015)

2017· article· en· W2761689687 on OpenAlexaff
Grant W. Lowey

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsYukon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTerraneSubductionMesozoicCretaceousFaciesTectonicsPaleontologyGeochemistryMargin (machine learning)Structural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Yokelson et al. (2015) present U‐Pb and Hf isotope analyses of detrital zircons from the Gravina belt showing that the western facies was derived from the west and the eastern facies was derived from the east and concluded that this is evidence that a west dipping subduction zone did not exist along the inboard margin of the Alexander‐Wrangellia terrane during Late Jurassic‐Early Cretaceous time as proposed by Sigloch and Mihalynuk (2013). However, the tectonic affinity of the eastern Gravina belt is open to debate, and Yokelson et al.'s (2015) claim that the Sigloch and Mihalynuk (2013) model of west dipping subduction was implausible is based on an incorrect assumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectonicsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207