MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761696276 · doi:10.1093/pch/15.6.368

La contraception d'urgence

2010· article· fr· W2761696276 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
DK Katzman, Danielle Taddeo

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyMedical prescription

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La contraception d’urgence est un moyen efficace de prévenir une grossesse involontaire ou non planifiée. Elle est offerte sous deux formes au Canada : une méthode ne contenant que de la progestine et une méthode hormonale combinée, ou méthode Yuzpe. Il est démontré que la contraception d’urgence est plus efficace dans les 72 heures à 120 heures après des relations sexuelles non protégées. Jusqu’à présent, la méthode ne contenant que de la progestine est privilégiée auprès des adolescentes en raison de sa plus grande efficacité et de son moins grand nombre d’effets secondaires. Elle est donc plus acceptée que la méthode combinée. Les adolescentes devraient également être informées que la méthode ne contenant que de la progestine est largement offerte sans prescription médicale au Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207