MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761736974 · doi:10.1111/jgs.15100

Effect of Preoperative Geriatric Evaluation on Outcomes After Elective Surgery: A Population‐Based Study

2017· article· en· W2761736974 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Daniel I. McIsaac, Allen Huang, Coralie A. Wong, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Gregory L. Bryson, Carl van Walraven

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersOttawa HospitalUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Anesthesiologists' SocietyInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of OttawaOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsMedicineGeriatricsElective surgeryPreoperative careMEDLINESurgeryGeneral surgeryGerontologyIntensive care medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Randomized and nonrandomized single-center studies suggest that preoperative geriatric evaluation improves postoperative outcomes in older adults. The generalizability and population-level effect of preoperative geriatric evaluation has not been determined. Our objective was to measure the adjusted association between preoperative geriatric evaluation and postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: Multilevel multivariable regression model analysis of a population-based historical cohort. SETTING: Publicly funded universal healthcare system in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All adults aged 65 and older having major, elective, noncardiac surgery from 2002 to 2014 (N = 266,499). INTERVENTION: We studied geriatric consultations and comprehensive assessments performed in the 4 months prior to surgery. These were identified using validated methods. MEASUREMENTS: Ninety-day survival (primary outcome), in-hospital complications, length of stay, 30-day readmissions, need for supported discharge, and 90-day costs of care. RESULTS: The 7,352 participants (2.8%) who had a preoperative geriatric evaluation had longer 90-day survival than those who who did not (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.81, 95% confidence interval = 0.68-0.95). Length of stay and complication rates did not differ between groups, but participants evaluated by a geriatrician preoperatively had higher rates of supported discharge, readmission rates, and costs of care. Sensitivity analyses supported the association between preoperative geriatric assessment and 90-day survival. CONCLUSION: In individuals aged 65 and older undergoing major, elective, noncardiac surgery, preoperative geriatric evaluation was associated with longer 90-day survival, but it is used infrequently. Given these results, and those of previous small studies, the influence of a geriatric evaluation on postoperative outcomes should be determined in a multicenter randomized trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietySame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207