Le conte de Cendrillon : de la Chine à l’Acadie sur les ailes de la tradition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le titre de l’article reflète le fait que le conte bien connu de Cendrillon a connu un long parcours à partir de ses origines asiatiques jusqu’au Canada français. C’est le conte qui a connu le plus grand nombre d’études comparatives depuis la première parue en 1879. Cendrillon représente le conte type 510A de la typologie Aarne-Thompson- Uther (Atu) et partage plusieurs éléments avec d’autres contes apparentés, dont Atu 480, Les Fées, ou Les Fées reconnaissantes. En tout, 35 versions du conte ont été recueillies en Acadie, soit le tiers du total répertorié dans la francophonie. Enfin, la « Cendrillouse » acadienne ressemble peu au personnage familier des contes de Perrault. On trouve même dans nos versions des détails scatologiques qui rappellent les fabliaux du Moyen-Âge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".