MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762095449 · doi:10.1386/public.27.53.13_1

Hosts and guests

2016· article· en· W2762095449 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)SightVisual artsPublic spacePolitical scienceMedia studiesAestheticsSociologyAdvertisingHistoryPublic relationsArtArchitectural engineeringBusinessArchaeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ‘Hosts and guests’traces public artworks produced by Other Sights for Artists’ Projects across the arc of the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Games, the subsequent anniversary of the City and the current context of reduced public resources. The article comments on the changing aesthetic, economic and regulatory conditions of public spaces and public life through a discussion of four projects: The Games are Open by Köbberling and Kaltwasser; Deadhead by the Bomfords, Digital Natives and A Monument to Mysterious Fires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublicSame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207