MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762114255 · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0235

Articular Cartilage Repair with Mesenchymal Stem Cells After Chondrogenic Priming: A Pilot Study

2017· article· en· W2762114255 on OpenAlexafffund
Troy D. Bornes, Adetola B. Adesida, Nadr M. Jomha

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Engineering Part A · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChondrogenesisMesenchymal stem cellAggrecanCartilageTissue engineeringHyaline cartilageOxygen tensionChemistryAndrologyTransplantationBiomedical engineeringCell biologyAnatomyPathologySurgeryMedicineBiologyArticular cartilageOsteoarthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal stem cells (BMSCs) are a promising cell source for treating articular cartilage defects. The objective of this study was to assess a protocol that involved autologous transplantation of BMSCs into full-thickness cartilage defects in sheep following isolation, expansion, and a short period (4 days) of chondrogenic priming. The impact of oxygen tension during preimplantation culture was investigated. It was hypothesized that chondrogenically primed BMSCs would produce superior cartilaginous repair tissue relative to control defects, and that culture under hypoxia would yield improved repair tissue in comparison to normoxia. Ovine BMSCs were isolated, expanded to passage 2, seeded within a hyaluronic acid (HYAFF) scaffold, and primed ex vivo in chondrogenic medium for 4 days under normoxia (21% oxygen) or hypoxia (3% oxygen). Full-thickness, 7-mm-diameter articular cartilage defects were created in the femoral condyles of five sheep. Twenty defects were treated with normoxia-cultured, autologous BMSC-seeded scaffolds (eight); hypoxia-cultured, autologous BMSC-seeded scaffolds (eight); cell-free scaffolds (two); or no implants (two). Preimplantation priming was evaluated through gene expression analysis using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. After 6 months, histological assessment was performed on repair tissues with a modified O'Driscoll scoring system and tissue dimension analysis. Priming of preimplantation BMSC-seeded scaffolds in chondrogenic medium for 4 days resulted in significantly increased gene expression of hyaline cartilage-related collagen II and aggrecan relative to unprimed BMSCs (p < 0.05). Defects implanted with chondrogenically primed BMSC-seeded scaffolds developed cartilaginous repair tissues that contained safranin O-positive proteoglycans, and had significantly larger repair tissue areas, higher percentages of defect fill, and improved histological scores than cell-free controls (p < 0.05). Although hypoxic culture improved the preimplantation gene expression profile, a consistent difference in histological scores was not found between normoxia- and hypoxia-seeded BMSC-seeded scaffolds after 6 months (p = 0.90). This study demonstrates in a sheep model that (1) chondrogenic priming ex vivo improves the gene expression profile of BMSCs; (2) chondrogenically primed BMSCs are associated with the development of superior cartilaginous tissue to cell-free controls within cartilage defects; and (3) oxygen tension during preimplantation ex vivo culture does not consistently modulate cartilaginous repair tissue formation following BMSC transplantation into cartilage defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTissue Engineering Part ASame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207