Bibliographic record
Abstract
Family-, genus- and species-level groups in the family Clusiidae (Diptera: Schizophora) are catalogued, providing reference to occurrences of these taxa in the literature, including all those relevant to nomenclature. Full synonymies are provided, including generic combinations for species, and the collection locality, depository and sex of primary type specimens. Published species distributions are provided, noting country and biogeographic region; specimen data representing new country records for species are listed. The Clusiidae are known from 636 species in 14 genera and three subfamilies, with many additional species expected. Nearly half of all described species are Sobarocephala, with 269 species, followed by the clusiodine genera Heteromeringia (86 species), Allometopon (68), Hendelia (53 species), Czernyola (50 species) and Clusiodes (31 species); the remaining eight genera (seven extant, one fossil) are smaller, consisting of 1 to 16 species. Two other fossil genera, Acartophthalmites Hennig and Xenanthomyza Hennig, are also treated here, but are unlikely to belong to the family. Taxa formerly considered Clusiidae are listed. Tranomeringia scutellata Sasakawa is transferred to Heteromeringia, n. comb. Czernyola is maintained as the replacement name for Craspedochaeta, following Bezzi (1907), McAlpine (1971) and Lonsdale, et al. (2010), resulting in the following new combinations: Czernyola amazonensis (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. apsilutea (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. argoniae (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. biloba (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. brunneivibrissa (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. candida (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. chauliodon (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. chela (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. concinna (Williston) n. comb.; C. feminea (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. loreto (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. maai (Sasakawa) n. comb.; C. melanosoma (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. novaeguinea (Soós) n. comb.; C. pacaraima (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. parva (Sasakawa) n. comb.; C. phaios (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. pilosa (Sasakawa) n. comb.; C. pleuralis (Williston) n. comb.; C. pollostos (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. protomis (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. quinquespinula (Sasakawa) n. comb.; C. sasakawai (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. spinulifera (Sasakawa) n. comb.; C. unguicauda (Sasakawa) n. comb.; C. varicolor (Sueyoshi) n. comb.; C. vietnamensis (Sasakawa) n. comb.; C. weemsi (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. xanthonotum (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.; C. xanthopleura (Sasakawa) n. comb.; C. zongo (Lonsdale & Marshall) n. comb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".