MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762273705 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.suppl_a.19a

10 Severe Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia: Cause for Concern?

2004· article· en· W2762273705 on OpenAlexaffabout
DM Campbell, Michael Sgro, Viral N. Shah

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineJaundiceExchange transfusionKernicterusPediatricsGestational ageEtiologyDiseaseEncephalopathyPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in the term neonate and bilrubin encephalopathy is rare, it is associated with significant morbidity. A number of reports have been published in recent years of bilirubin encephalopathy in term neonates who appeared to be healthy and breast-fed with no evidence of hemolytic disease (Maisels 1995, Ebbesen 2000). Some risk factors are known to be associated with severe hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn and include: jaundice in the first 24 hours of life, previous sibling with jaundice, and gestational age of 35 to 38 weeks (Dennery et al 2001). Additional risk factors include Rh and ABO incompatibility and Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Attempts to better quantify the frequency, etiologies and risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia would be of value prior to identifying strategies for risk reduction. Our objective was to obtain epidemiological data about severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in order to develop prevention strategies for this condition. Data on term infants 60 days of age or less with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia was collected from July 2002 to present through the Canadian Pediatric Surveillance Program. Criteria for inclusion in this study included: 1) peak serum total bilirubin >425 μmol/L or 2) neonatal exchange transfusion. Infants who had exchange transfusions for well-documented Rh isoimmunization disease or were less than 36 weeks of gestational age were excluded. After 16 months of surveillance 220 cases of severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were reported. Of these, 148 were confirmed, 33 were duplicates or discarded, and 39 are still under review. In only 47 cases was the cause of the hyperbilirubinemia identified. The etiologies included ABO incompatibility (n=28), G6PD deficiency (n=13), other antibodies (n=4), and unstable hemoglobin (n=2). The range of bilirubin reported was from 156 to 731 μmol/L. 37 of the neonates required exchange transfusion, while all neonates were treated with phototherapy. 6 neonates had documented hearing loss and 3 had seizures prior to discharge from hospital. This study shows that severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia continues to occur in term neonates with significant morbidity. In the majority of cases the underlying etiology could not be identified, which could partly be attributed to incomplete evaluation at the time of presentation. This finding highlights the importance of a complete hematological workup for such children prior to discharge such as a screen for blood group, Coomb's testing, peripheral smear, and a screen for G6PD. Further testing including a hearing assessment and close pediatric follow-up is also likely to be beneficial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207