MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762434646 · doi:10.24839/1089-4136.jn14.3.93

Recreational Ballet Students: The Mirror Image of Professional Ballet Aesthetics?

2009· article· en· W2762434646 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaime F. Kaplan

Bibliographic record

VenuePsi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalletRecreationArtVisual artsAestheticsBallet dancerClassical balletDancePsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About Psi ChiPsi Chi is the International Honor So ci ety in Psychology, found ed in 1929 for the pur pos es of encouraging, stim u lat ing, and maintaining ex cel lence in schol ar ship, and advancing the sci ence of psy chol ogy.Mem ber ship is open to gradu ate and under gradu ate men and women who are mak ing the study of psy chol ogy one of their major interests and who meet the min i mum qual i fi ca tions.Psi Chi is a member of the As so cia tion of Col lege Honor So ci et ies (ACHS) and is an affiliate of the Ameri can Psy cho logi cal As so cia- tion (APA) and the Amer i can Psy cho log i cal Society (APS).Psi Chi's sister honor society is Psi Beta, the na tion al honor society in psychology for com mu nity and junior colleges.Psi Chi functions as a federation of chap ters located at over 1,000 senior col leg es and universities in the U.S. and Canada.The Psi Chi Central Office is lo cat ed in Chatta nooga, Ten nessee.A Board of Directors, com posed of psy chol o gists who are Psi Chi members and who are elect ed by the chapters, guides the affairs of the or ga ni za tion and sets pol i cy with the ap prov al of the chap ters.Psi Chi serves two major goals-one immediate and visibly re ward ing to the in di vid u al member, the other slower and more dif fi cult to accomplish, but of fer ing greater rewards in the long run.The first of these is the Society's ob li ga tion to pro vide ac a dem ic rec og ni tion to its in duc tees by the mere fact of mem ber ship.The sec ond goal is the obligation of each of the Society's local chapters to nurture the spark of that ac com plishment by offering a climate congenial to its creative de vel op ment.For ex am ple, the chapters make ac tive at tempts to nourish and stim u late pro fes sion al growth through pro grams de signed to augment and en hance the reg u lar cur ric u lum and to provide prac ti cal ex pe ri ence and fellowship through af fil i a tion with the chapter.In addition, the or ga ni za tion provides programs to help achieve these goals including re gional and Society conven tions, research award and grant competitions, cer tifi cate rec og ni tion programs, chapter awards, and Society ser vice projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.553
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsi Chi Journal of Psychological ResearchSame topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207