The Dependent Effects of Mental Smartness and Staff Outputs of Sports Company’s Managers in Developing Staffs Efficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this study is investigating the leader’s passionate smartness, administration technique and agent consequence. In other words, this paper specifies the effects of management method on the passionate smartness and staff outcomes including, job quality, job difficulty, organizational commitment and Employee Performance. Statistical Society is provided in two sport organizations in Iran by 350 populations. These participants are combined of administrators and staffs. Passionate smartness and administration technique are evaluated by considering Wong Mental smartness Scale and Wong Mental smartness Scale methods, respectively. Findings indicate that Leadership techniques are as a tradeoff between passionate smartness and feelings. Whilst, there was no evident to demonstrate the relation between Leadership techniques and job quality, staff performance and job difficulty. Also, results show that in order to analyze the passionate smartness, staff outputs and staff works, the relation and link between management and staffs should be considered. In other words, transferring the administration from manger to employees has the main role in staff satisfaction, management and job quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".