MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762631215 · doi:10.2807/esw.06.47.01965-en

European travellers affected by the outbreak of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Northern Queensland, Australia

2002· article· en· W2762631215 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joanne Lawrence

Bibliographic record

VenueWeekly releases (1997–2007) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTravel-related health issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalariaOutbreakGeographyPlasmodium vivaxSocioeconomicsPublic healthUnit (ring theory)National parkEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental healthMedicinePlasmodium falciparumArchaeologyVirologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An outbreak of Plasmodium vivax malaria at a campsite in Northern Queensland has affected 10 people including three overseas visitors (one from Ireland, one from Germany, and one from Canada). The outbreak occurred during the first two weeks of October 2002 in tourists staying at the Noah Beach campsite, which is a campsite in Daintree National Park, Cape Tribulation. Park rangers have used details from self-registration forms at the campsite to compile a list of visitors to Noah Beach during the period of malaria transmission. Where contact details were available, the Tropical Public Health Unit in Queensland contacted individuals to inform them of the occurrence of malaria and offer advice. Visitors to the park have included travellers from the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Italy, Israel, the Netherlands, and Sweden (Dianne Brookes (Dianne_Brookes@health.qld.gov.au), Tropical Public Health Unit, Queensland, personal communication, 12 November 2002).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWeekly releases (1997–2007)Same topicTravel-related health issuesFrench-language works237,207