Toward failure mode and effect analysis for heating, ventilation and air-conditioning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fault Detection, Diagnostics and Prognostics (FDD&P) is attracting a lot of attention from building operators and researchers because it can help greatly improve the performance of building operations by reducing energy consumption for heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) while improving occupant comfort at the same time. However, FDD&P for building operations remains with many challenges due to special operation environments of HVAC systems. These challenges include `tolerance or ignorance' of failures in long-haul operations, lack of operation regulations, and even lack of documents for HVAC failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), which is a systematic method of identifying and preventing system, product and process problems. To address some of these challenges, we propose to develop a FMEA for HVAC by exploring work orders generated by building energy management systems (BEMS) using a data mining approach. With the developed HVAC FMEA, it is possible to conduct pre-FDD&P procedures to improve HVAC maintenance and to select the high impact failures in order to acquire the operation data for selected failures and develop machine learning-based predictive models to predict a failure before it occurs and isolate the root component of a given failure. In this paper we report some preliminary results in developing an HVAC FMEA tool from a large number of work orders obtained from a BEMS in routine operations. The developed HVAC FMEA will be used as a guidance tool for data gathering and developing data-driven models for building HVAC FDD&P.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".