MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762724794 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.155303

Dual emission and optical gain in PbS/CdS nanocrystals: Role of shell volume and of core/shell interface

2017· article· en· W2762724794 on OpenAlexafffund
Gianluca Sirigu, Andrea Camellini, Haiguang Zhao, Lei Jin, Federico Rosei, Alberto Vomiero, M. Zavelani–Rossi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseCanada Research ChairsMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaEuropean CommissionKempe Foundation
KeywordsMaterials scienceShell (structure)PhotoluminescenceExcitonOptoelectronicsCore (optical fiber)NanocrystalNanotechnologyLight emissionQuantum dotPhysicsCondensed matter physicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs) emitting simultaneously at two distinct wavelengths are of great interest for multiple applications ranging from ultrasensitive self-calibrating nanoscale sensing to light-emitting diodes and white-light emission. The physical mechanism governing dual emission in core/shell NCs composed of two materials is still under investigation; in particular, the roles of the volume of the shell and of the core/shell interface are not well understood. Here we compare three different PbS/CdS NCs with identical cores, but shells of different thicknesses and different core/shell interfaces. We study photoluminescence (PL) characteristics and ultrafast exciton dynamics with subpicosecond time resolution. We find that dual emission is possible for both thick and thin quantum-confined shells, and for different core/shell interfaces. We show that very thick shells allow the decoupling of shell excitons from core ones and we fully describe the dynamic exciton barrier, connected to efficient shell PL. We discuss the efficiency of shell PL in relation to the properties of the NCs and show that it can give rise to optical gain. Our results provide a comprehensive understanding of the physical phenomena governing dual-emission mechanisms in NCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207