MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762789574

Introduction to Special Issue: Assessing Adaptive Transboundary Governance Capacity in the Great Lakes Basin

2016· article· en· W2762789574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathryn Bryk Friedman, Debora L. VanNijnatten

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Water Governance · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural basinGeographyPopulationRecreationDrainage basinQuarter (Canadian coin)International watersCorporate governanceWater resource managementFisheryEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental scienceBusinessArchaeologyPolitical scienceGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Intro] The Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Basin is the largest international freshwater basin on earth (Waples et al., 2008) containing roughly 20 percent of the world’s freshwater supply. It is home to nearly 104 million people, including more than one-tenth of the population of the United States and one-quarter of the population of Canada. Collectively, the five lakes and their draining river systems span two nations, eight states, two provinces, more than forty First Nations, and hundreds of municipalities. This transboundary basin plays a major role in the economic development of the United States and Canada, and continues to provide water for domestic consumption, industry, transportation, power, recreation, and a host of other uses. ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Water GovernanceSame topicTransboundary Water Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207