MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762805349 · doi:10.1364/oe.25.0a1023

Influence of luminescent material properties on stimulated emission luminescent solar concentrators (SELSCs) using a 4-level system

2017· article· en· W2762805349 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrew G. Flood, Nazir P. Kherani

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConnaught FundUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsLuminescenceLaser linewidthMaterials scienceSpontaneous emissionOpticsRefractive indexAmplified spontaneous emissionLaserWavelengthRadiative transferQuantum efficiencyStokes shiftOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

, and a refractive index of 1.5, the optimal length of an SELSC is found to be ~1.5m. Given these losses and an efficiency target of 10% greater than traditional LSCs, the required material emission linewidth varies from 10 to 100nm, with maximum thicknesses of 3-30 µm. Further, when reflection and propagation losses are considered, a single laser pass is preferred over multiple passes. It is also shown that SELSCs are significantly less sensitive to luminescent quantum efficiency when compared to conventional LSCs due to the increased radiative emission rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207