MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W27628619 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jew194

Burnout e stress ocupacional em advogados e magistrados: a necessidade de investigação empírica

2011· article· pt· W27628619 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lígia Afonso, Cristina Queirós

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Burnout
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondation Institut de Cardiologie de MontréalUniversité de MontréalFédération Française de Cardiologie
KeywordsBurnoutOccupational stressMedicineStress (linguistics)PsychologyClinical psychologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo de Comunicacao no VIII Congresso Iberoamericano de Avaliacao/Evaluacion Psicologica e XV Conferencia Internacional Avaliacao Psicologica: Formas e Contextos

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicOccupational Health and BurnoutFrench-language works237,207