Efficient Graphene Production by Combined Bipolar Electrochemical Intercalation and High-Shear Exfoliation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In this study, we demonstrate that bipolar electrochemistry is a viable strategy for “wireless” electrochemical intercalation of graphite flakes and further large-scale production of high-quality graphene suspensions. Expansion of the graphite layers leads to a dramatic 20-fold increase in the yield of high-shear exfoliation. Large graphite flakes, which do not produce graphene upon high shear if left untreated, are exfoliated in a yield of 16.0 ± 0.2%. Successful graphene production was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy, showing that the graphene flakes are 0.4–1.5 μm in size with the majority of flakes consisting of 4–6 graphene layers. Moreover, a low intensity of the D peak relative to the G peak as expressed by the I D / I G ratio in Raman spectroscopy along with high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images reveals that the graphene sheets are essentially undamaged by the electrochemical intercalation. Some impurities reside on the graphene after the electrochemical treatment, presumably because of oxidative polymerization of the solvent, as suggested by electron energy loss spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. In general, the bipolar electrochemical exfoliation method provides a pathway for intercalation on a wider range of graphite substrates and enhances the efficiency of the exfoliation. This method could potentially be combined with simultaneous electrochemical functionalization to provide graphene specifically designed for a given composite on a larger scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".