MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762914390 · doi:10.1109/mitp.2017.3680958

Managing Diabetes Therapy through Datastream Mining

2017· article· en· W2762914390 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIT Professional · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Stream Mining Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabetes mellitusComputer scienceBusinessMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) therapy, a suitable insulin dosage taken at the appropriate times is needed for each patient to sustain the necessary blood-glucose level for his or her body. In this article, a datastream mining approach is proposed that can computationally derive real-time decision rules for formulating IDDM therapy based on insulin prescription records and patients' blood-glucose reactions. Decision rules are based on the latest health conditions, which are monitored continuously from the patient rather than from a historical data archive of a population accumulated over years. Hence, the rules are adaptive and more accurately predict whether a medical implication will occur, given that glucose levels fluctuate under different medical effects, such as lifestyle changes, medication type, or other external factors. A computer simulation experiment is conducted for evaluating the most suitable datastream algorithms with respect to accuracy and speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it