MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762999520 · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00311

Room Temperature Magnesite Precipitation

2017· article· en· W2762999520 on OpenAlexafffund
Ian Power, Paul A. Kenward, Gregory M. Dipple, Mati Raudsepp

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTrent University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMagnesiteCalciteCarbonationChemical engineeringCarbon fibersPrecipitationMagnesiumChemistryCarbonateMineralogyCalcium carbonateMineralMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryComposite materialComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnesite (MgCO 3 ) is one of the most stable sinks for carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and is therefore of great interest for long-term carbon storage. Although magnesite is the thermodynamically stable form of magnesium carbonate, the kinetic inhibition of low-temperature precipitation has hindered the development of carbon sequestration strategies that can be economically conducted under ambient temperature. Here, we document the precipitation of magnesite from waters (magnesite saturation index = 1.45) in batch reactors at room temperature with the aid of carboxylated polystyrene microspheres over the course of 70 days. Microspheres provide surfaces with a high density of carboxyl groups that act to bind and dehydrate Mg 2+ ions in solution, thereby minimizing the kinetic barrier and facilitating magnesite formation. Magnesite crystals are observed on sphere surfaces and their organic matrixes. Mineral identification was confirmed by X-ray diffraction and selected area electron diffraction of a thin section obtained by focused ion beam milling. We demonstrate that kinetic barriers to magnesite formation can be overcome at ambient conditions. Incorporating surfaces with high carboxyl site densities into ex situ mineral carbonation processes and the use of such ligands for deep geologic CO 2 storage may offer novel and economically viable strategies for permanent carbon storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrystal Growth & DesignSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207