Bibliographic record
Abstract
The immune response against platelets is a complex process involving many aspects of the innate and adaptive immune system. Immune destruction of platelets and megakaryocytes and the thrombocytopenia that ensues can cause different clinically significant haematological disorders such as foetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT), transfusion‐induced platelet refractoriness or immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). These conditions are frequently difficult to manage so an understanding of the biological nature of these adverse conditions is critical for an understanding of how to potentially reduce them. Superimposed on these immune platelet attack mechanisms are the immune characteristics of the platelets themselves. This paper will give an overview of how the immune system recognizes platelet antigens and mounts efficient effector mechanism to mediate thrombocytopenia. It will also present evidence to suggest that platelets also play a role in stimulating these responses and suppressing them: a scenario where the ‘prey’ can become the ‘predator’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".