Du développement du capitalisme à l’infini plan-séquence : les quatre « utopies » de Porno-Teo-Kolossal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse le traitement d’un film jamais réalisé de Pier Paolo Pasolini, Porno-Teo-Kolossal. Il se propose de montrer que les quatre mondes qu’y traversent les deux protagonistes peuvent être compris comme des variations sur la modalité de l’utopie, à savoir l’utopie, la dystopie, l’uchronie et l’atopie ; les trois premiers moments correspondent à la mise en récit de la conscience d’une Europe en voie d’homologation et en butte aux pouvoirs autoritaires et fascistes, alors que le quatrième moment correspond à ce que Pasolini entrevoyait comme une potentialité venue du Sud. Ce parcours doit être considéré comme étant « révolutionnaire », non pas au sens téléologique du terme, mais plutôt au sens du mot latin revolutio, qui signifie « retour à l’origine ». Cette lecture de Porno-Teo-Kolossal permettra de faire entendre une conception de l’engagement qui serait basée sur un infini plan-séquence irréductible à l’opération du montage-mort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".