MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763271008 · doi:10.24870/cjb.2017-a138

Assessment of Health problems and Genetic Damage in Residents of Uppal Industrial Area

2017· article· en· W2763271008 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chiliveri Prashanth, Vanitha Baluka, Pinninti Pavain Kumar Reddy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Biotechnology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental healthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uppal and Patancheruvu are two important industrial zones in twin cities. Since 1980's many industries such as pharmaceutical drugs, paints, pesticides, steel, plastics, textiles, leather, rubber, etc. were established. Many a time complaints of Industrial Pollution from residents of Uppal industry area were received by the government with a request to kindly take necessary step to prevent industrial pollution in this area. Although very few studies were carried out on people living here and hence an attempt was made to take up a large scale study. Epidemiological, genetic, cytogenetic and molecular studies were carried out in subjects living in Uppal industrial area. For comparison the residents of Ameerpet were selected (control group). 560 people residing in and around Uppal Industrial belt were selected for epidemiological studies and for comparison people living in non-industrial area (Ameerpet) and not exposed to either agricultural or industrial chemicals occupationally were selected (Control group).The results showed an increased frequency of health problems when compared to control group. The prominent health problems were hypertension, diabetes, renal problems, skin problems, gastrointestinal disorders, infections, nervous disorders, muscular pain, respiratory disorders, and weakness/lassitude. Reproductive outcome of 175 couples living in this area was studied. The reproductive outcome was assessed by measuring the incidence of abortions, stillbirths, malformations, prenatal deaths, etc. The results showed a decrease in the fertility (87.33% against 88.88% in control group) and a high incidence of abortions (8.41% against 5.09% in control group). Studies on incidence of chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in 60 people living here were taken up and results shown the increased levels of cytogenetic damage when compared to the controls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BiotechnologySame topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207