MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763281520 · doi:10.24870/cjb.2017-a194

Analysis of iron and zinc homeostasis in barnyard millet through transcriptome and ionome approach

2017· article· en· W2763281520 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
V. Vijay Prabha, M. Raveendran, P. Jeyakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Biotechnology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIron homeostasisTranscriptomeZincBiologyBiotechnologyMetallurgyBiochemistryMaterials scienceGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron (Fe) and Zinc (Zn) are the most essential micronutrients needed for the growth and metabolism of higher plants. Fe and Zn has important role as a component of various enzymes that are involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis, photosynthesis and seed development. Plants have evolved with multifaceted Fe and Zn homeostatic mechanisms that regulate its acquisition from the environment and the movement between organelles, cells, tissues, and organs. In addition, Plant establishes a tightly controlled system including metal specific uptake transporters and transcriptional regulators to balance the uptake, utilization and storage of metal ions. Barnyard millet (Echinocloa frumentaceae), one of the minor millets is superior in Fe and Zn content compared to the most widely consumed cereals like rice and wheat. In the present study, ionomic profiling of grains of several barnyard millet accessions revealed that accession ACM-10-145 accumulates high Fe and Zn content (Fe: 14.5 mg/100g; Zn: 2.18 mg/100g). Furthermore, transcriptomic studies are in progress to understand the key factors involved in metal uptake and translocation in barnyard millet. The research outcome could be exploited for biofortification program in cereals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BiotechnologySame topicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsFrench-language works237,207