MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763394013 · doi:10.1115/omae2017-61193

A Robust Three-Phase Isenthalpic Flash Algorithm Based on Free-Water Assumption

2017· article· en· W2763394013 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruixue Li, Huazhou Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsIsothermal processFlash (photography)Flash evaporationComputer scienceEnthalpyPhase (matter)ThermodynamicsWork (physics)Materials scienceAlgorithmMechanicsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiphase isenthalpic flash calculations are often required in compositional simulations of steam-based enhanced oil recovery methods. These flash calculations are challenging in the narrow-boiling regions and in the determination of the correct number of existing phases. Based on the free-water assumption that the aqueous phase is pure water, a robust and efficient algorithm is proposed to perform isenthalpic three-phase flash calculations in this work. Multiphase equilibria can be considered by this algorithm, including single-phase equilibria, two-phase equilibria, and three-phase vapor-liquid-aqueous equilibria. Isenthalpic flash is a type of flash calculation conducted at given pressure and enthalpy for a feed mixture. In the proposed algorithm, assuming the feed is stable, the temperature is first determined by solving the energy conservation equation. Then the stability test on the feed mixture is conducted at the calculated temperature and the given pressure. If the mixture is found unstable, the two-phase and three-phase vapor-liquid-aqueous isenthalpic flash calculations can be simultaneously initiated without resorting to stability tests. To achieve simultaneous flashes, the outer loop is used to update the temperature by solving the energy conservation equation. The inner loop is used to obtain phase fractions and compositions by performing a three-phase free-water isothermal flash. Note that a two-phase isothermal flash will be initiated if an open feasible region in the phase fractions appears in any iteration during the three-phase isothermal flash or any of the ultimately calculated phase fractions from the three-phase flash do not belong to [0,1]. Negative flash is allowed in the three-phase free-water isothermal flash. A number of example calculations for water/hydrocarbon mixtures are carried out to test the robustness of the proposed algorithm. At low to medium pressures, a good agreement can be achieved between the results obtained by this algorithm and those obtained by the conventional algorithm. This algorithm performs well for the narrow-boiling regions, for example, the three-phase vapor-liquid-aqueous equilibrium region encountered for the water/hydrocarbon mixtures. During the iteration, the new algorithm can readily handle the appearance and disappearance of phases in the inner loop as temperature updates in the outer loop. The number of stability tests involved in the new algorithm is significantly reduced, helping to boost its computational efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207