MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2763495549 · doi:10.22456/2176-5456.70302

UMA AVALIAÇÃO DA TEORIA DA DOENÇA HOLANDESA E DA HIPÓTESE DA MALDIÇÃO DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS

2017· article· pt· W2763495549 on OpenAlexaff
Clarissa Black

Bibliographic record

VenueAnálise Econômica · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicNatural Resources and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo propõe uma discussão sobre a teoria da doença holandesa, seus antecedentes e as suas principais críticas. Apresenta-se o modelo estático, que demonstra os mecanismos de transmissão da doença holandesa para a economia. Expõe-se também o modelo dinâmico, baseado na teoria do crescimento endógeno e com princípios de doença holandesa, utilizado como explicação para a maldição dos recursos naturais. Por fim, evidenciam-se as principais críticas teóricas e metodológicas desses modelos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnálise EconômicaSame topicNatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207