EXPLORING THE ROLE OF COMMUNITY AGENCY EMPLOYEES WHEN ACTING AS PRIMARY POINT OF CARE CONTACTS FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH SUSPECTED DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES IN TORONTO ONTARIO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification and referral of children for developmental evaluation is complex. Children with adverse social determinants of health (SDOH), and newcomer families face additional barriers to accessing developmental services, and their caregivers require further support in managing their child’s developmental care. The routine pathway to diagnosis is referral to a developmental specialist by a primary care physician, however, families with challenging SDOH often rely on community agency staff for a identification and referral. Community agency workers often play a key role in connecting families to primary care physicians (pediatricians and family physicians). However, very little is known on the experiences, challenges and role community workers play in their role as the primary point of care contact for families of children with developmental concerns. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore the experiences and challenges that community agency employees face in their role of a primary point of care contact for families with children showing signs of developmental delay and liaison to primary care physicians. DESIGN/METHODS: A qualitative grounded theory approach was used through a series of focus group discussions. Participants were school board employees or staff members of Toronto-area community agencies that offer assessments, referrals, or early intervention programs for children with a suspected or diagnosed developmental diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of twelve community agency employees and school board workers from six different community agencies participated in focus groups. Community agency employees reported the following barriers in completing their role; 1) parental denial of their childs developmental concerns, 2) difference of opinions between a pediatricians diagnosis and the community workers opinion about the child development, and 3) restrictions in the referral process resulting in delayed developmental diagnosis. Community agency workers attributed these barriers to the lack of communication between physician and community agencies. They suggested opportunities to collaborate with primary care physicians; Its going to have to be a collaboration between the doctors and the workers in supporting all these families and provide the services, but also making sure that the news isbeing delivered at the right time.”- Community Agency Worker 1. CONCLUSION: There is a currently a disconnect between primary care physicians and community agency workers in identifying, diagnosing, and managing children with developmental concerns. This study highlights the need for a comprehensive assessment and integration of services and professionals when managing children with developmental concerns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".